Prior to their departure to a location in the diaspora, firm directors loaned agents a substantial amount of capital.
This generally took the form of a commodity that was in demand in the specific destination’s market, most commonly cotton textiles.
Over the course of the 17th century, these communities grew larger and more numerous.
One 17th-century Bukharan Khan issued a decree (, foll. Several primary centers of diaspora activity emerged in those Eurasian locations most conducive to mediating trans-regional commerce, including Isfahan, Bandar-e ʿAbbās, Astrakhan, Kandahar, Kabul, and Bukhara, each of which hosted communities of several hundred to several thousand Indian merchants.
INDIAN MERCHANTS IN CENTRAL ASIA AND IRAN The Indian merchant diaspora in Central Asia and Persia emerged in the mid-16th century and remained active for over four centuries.
Jean Baptiste Tavernier suggested that the Indian merchant-moneylenders were capitalized at 8-10 percent annual interest, and they used that principal to extend loans at considerably higher interest rates (Tavernier, pp. Indian moneylenders were active in both urban and rural markets.Jenkinson visited Bukhara in 1558-59, where he observed that it was common for the Indian merchants who traveled there to stay for several years while they conducted their trade (Jenkinson, p. The lengthy residence of these Indians suggests that, rather than itinerant caravan traders, they were “Multanis,” the commercial group that comprised the dominant population of the Indian diaspora in Central Asia and Persia.Legal records dating to 966/1559 and 968/1561 place several Multanis in Bukhara (Ivanov, pp.109-10, 122-23, 247-48), and a series of entries in the late 16th-century ) of one of the numerous family firms centered in the northwestern Indian city of Multan.While each individual family firm was homogeneous on the basis of caste, the term Multani more generally referred to the heterogeneous conglomeration of Indian merchants who participated in diaspora commerce as agents of numerous Multani firms.It is not surprising that, despite popular traditions portraying the merchants of the Indian diaspora as exploitative usurers, they enjoyed the protection of the Safavid and Bukharan rulers.